what really is quantum mechanics?

[AntonioLao]

It is all about the quantization of time axis. Since the discovery of the spin quantum number, the property of intrinsic spin is found for every elementary particle. Particles with multiple of half integral spin (1/2, 3/2, 5/2, 7/2, ...) are called fermions. Those with integral spin (0,1,2,3,4,..) are called bosons. There are two quantized time axes, the positive and the negative axis. For fermions, these quanta of time axis are not congruent, for bosons, the axes are congruent.

[Guille]

Nobody REALLY understands quantum mechanics. I personally think that QM is not correctly and completely philosophically described and defined yet, when philosophers go well about it, then we can discuss what it really scientifically means to nature.

[AntonioLao]

Nobody REALLY understands quantum mechanics.

This is true only if we don't accept the existence of the negative time axis.

[Guille]

This is true only if we don't accept the existence of the negative time axis.

But if we accept the existence of such thing as the negative time axis, we should accepthe idea that there is a difference between past and future. I don't. As I've arlready said before, I don't believe that the entropy has anything to do with the direction of time. Time has no direction, it is the collection of the possible directions in it self, which are two popposites. Now, there is no possible way of differentiating one opposite from the other, and thus, there is no such thing as negative time axis. Als o there is no such thing as negative time axis because you can't say were the positive ends and negative start, because the suhc thing as present doesn't exist, and there are infinite presents, which is the real present? none. It's all relative...

[AntonioLao]

The acceptance of positive time axis is implied in all physical theories even inside our brains. We sense the passing of time. However, this sensation is really caused by the movement of our positive time axis getting closer and closer to the universal time axis, this is not a motion or translation in space but a spiraling or rotating motion that decreases only the angular distances but not extending spatial distances, say from here to there. We are always here inside the universe.

[Guille]

But NO!

We don't accept the idea of positive time axis. We just accept that we are moving in time in the direction that our mind and body tell's us. Is this correct? Are we to understand that sometihng is happening because our mind and body say so? I believe yes and no. Yes because what we are made of is our mind and body, and so, we do what they do, for they are the two parts that constitute us. No because our perception and thoughts can be wrong, unreal, untrue....We are not completely rational, and we don't have perfect senses.

[AntonioLao]

human frailty should never be used as an excuse for failing to understand the working of the universe. Take the case for the music of Bethoven, he was born deaf, yet he composed the greatest symphonies the world had even known.

[Guille]

human frailty should never be used as an excuse for failing to understand the working of the universe. Take the case for the music of Bethoven, he was born deaf, yet he composed the greatest symphonies the world had even known.

yes, what you mean is true, limitations are nto enought o explain unsatisfying acheivements.

But, I think bethoven wasn't born deaf, he become deaf in his old age.

[AntonioLao]

I think bethoven wasn't born deaf

I thought he composed his music by tactile senses or by touch? Maybe I was mistaken? I'll recheck his biographical facts.

[Guille]

I thought he composed his music by tactile senses or by touch? Maybe I was mistaken? I'll recheck his biographical facts.

Ok, I will also do so later. But I actuallly think he became deaf, not sure on this.