Dimensional Axis

[Guille]

Antonio,

I have been the whole night awake. I went to by bed at 12, but still after more than an hour trying, I had no sing of going to be able to sleep. So I got out and decided to sart working. I centered my study on what I like calling DAT (Dimensional Axis Theory) but trying to solve my problem in the photogravitational theory. It was 7:30 when the sun started to rise, and I sudenly drax a circle on a paper I had infront of me with two orthogonal lines, crossing each other in the middle, and each side representing a dimension of the 4. Then I realised it all: the line of the circle was the end of the universe, the space was the universe itself, and the two lines were the dimensions.

I discovered that actually string theorists might have quite a few things right, but that they viewed it all wrongly. The BB is the where the dimensions begin, just when they were 0 and started to exist. Then, as you go further from the interesction between the two lines (one vertical and one horizontal, growing two each in two directions), they, (the lines, the dimensions), grow and grow and grow, as well as the universe, and then, you come to the part that there is a circular line from which the other two lines can't go out, they are inside, this line is the end of the universe, in space and in time.

It's hard to visualize, I will send you an e-mail with an image attachend showing everything clearly.

[AntonioLao]

It's hard to visualize,

You might have rediscovered projection of Riemannian sphere of a point or line at infinity.

[Guille]

You might have rediscovered projection of Riemannian sphere of a point or line at infinity.

Maybe,

How does that look like?

[AntonioLao]

How does that look like?

I'm still trying to find the website that shows this projection clearly. I found it once before, now I don't remember the site.

[AntonioLao]

How does that look like?

This is the closest that I can find about the projetion of points of the Riemann sphere onto the tangent plane. Note that this type of projection is widely use in photogrammetry and cartogaphic mapping.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Stereog...rojection.html

[Guille]

This is the closest that I can find about the projetion of points of the Riemann sphere onto the tangent plane. Note that this type of projection is widely use in photogrammetry and cartogaphic mapping.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Stereog...rojection.html

it looks quite similar to my discovery.

I 'll send you the e-mail today.

[AntonioLao]

Let's take a 3D Cartesian coordinate system. We agree that there are three orthogonal axes namely X, Y, and Z. Furthermore, we say this system is three dimensional as implied by the symbol '3D'. Suppose we removed one axis, say the Z-axis. What dimension would become?

[Guille]

Let's take a 3D Cartesian coordinate system. We agree that there are three orthogonal axes namely X, Y, and Z. Furthermore, we say this system is three dimensional as implied by the symbol '3D'. Suppose we removed one axis, say the Z-axis. What dimension would become?

2d? (I have to write this because the post has to be more legthfull than 2d?)

[AntonioLao]

2d? (I have to write this because the post has to be more legthfull than 2d?)

So, 3D objects cannot move in a 2D coordinate system or frame of reference. However, the 2D projections of these 3D objects could. We can see the shadows move on the walls without really visualizing the 3D objects. Furthermore, all of us can be considered as shadows of 4D objects. Moreover, because of the strange properties of light (such as coherence and refraction and reflection and diffraction and dispesion, etc.), the shadows can appear larger (principle of telescope) or smaller (principle of microscope) than their higher dimensional counterparts.

[Guille]

I know about this error of reprsentations.

Does it also happen in the time dimensions, let's imagen there are three, then, a representation of a 3-time-dimensional object in a 2-time-dimensional object, would give a false representation?