[Guille]

If quantum mechanics is correct, then, each particle can be in an infinite (or a very large number) of space-time coordinate points. Then, if your theory, Antonio, about time and space axes is correct, then, we must agree that each particle has a time and a space axis. But if we mix this one with QM, then we conclude that each particle has an infinite amount of different time and space axis.

Is this a correct derivation? Did you realize before?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE each particle has an infinite amount of different time and space axis.

To choose from. It's all a matter of choice, for each particle can only be in a unique quantum state at a time. We cannot be both inside the room and outside the room unless 'inside' and 'outside' are not well defined.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao To choose from. It's all a matter of choice, for each particle can only be in a unique quantum state at a time. We cannot be both inside the room and outside the room unless 'inside' and 'outside' are not well defined.

According to QM we CAN be at two places at the same time. What do you have to fight qm, and support your claims?

Anyway, how can a particle "choose"?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE According to QM we CAN be at two places at the same time

Only if you are a boson. Since we are fermions and obey Pauli's exclusion principle, we cannot be in many places at once. Light is a boson and it can be in all places at the same time. Its applications are in the technology of the LASER. Population inversion is equivalent to having all photons sharing a common point of spacetime. That is to say the photon there is the same as the photon here or any photon anywhere.

A particle can choose only if it loses its identity and remain stationary by not choosing or moving or just the opposite of not choosing at all. So that all particles are the same any direction you look, you are just looking at yourselves like looking into an enclosed mirror all around you, up-down, left-right, for-back.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Only if you are a boson. Since we are fermions and obey Pauli's exclusion principle, we cannot be in many places at once. Light is a boson and it can be in all places at the same time. Its applications are in the technology of the LASER. Population inversion is equivalent to having all photons sharing a common point of spacetime. That is to say the photon there is the same as the photon here or any photon anywhere.

What if I say that our minds (not brains!) are maide of bosons?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE What if I say that our minds (not brains!) are maide of bosons?

Then a collective mind is possible! All our minds can be collected together and function as one super-mind.

[dleviwing]

God is proud of you Guille!

[Guille]

Originally Posted by dleviwing God is proud of you Guille!

Who?

Why?

Antonio,

Maybe there is another boson particle about which we don't know, and that is the particle of the 5th force, which is the mind, and maybe there are other parts were the force is. And there is no problem that we can't get our mind togethe,r we can. Now you and me are constructing toughts together, although not directly as someone would say, we are doing so, because the wrods we right come directly form our thoughts.

[dleviwing]

Guille;
Are you saying that it is OK to promote a scientific hypothesis of a supper consciousness, but to say there is a God, is wrong?
Have you found a religion acceptable to you?

[Guille]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Guille; Are you saying that it is OK to promote a scientific hypothesis of a supper consciousness, but to say there is a God, is wrong? Have you found a religion acceptable to you?

no!!!!

I have not and will never succump into the horrible grounds of religion!

Haven't you read my response to antonio? I am trying to see if maybe that boson is not aable to sum up, into a supper mind.