The dual

[AntonioLao]

If you take away square of energy, you lose all the energy you got. if you lose your energy you also lose your mass. If you lose your mass you have only disconnected your mind from the physical body because as square of energy, the mind lives on regardless of what happens to your body mass.

[Guille]

If you take away square of energy, you lose all the energy you got. if you lose your energy you also lose your mass. If you lose your mass you have only disconnected your mind from the physical body because as square of energy, the mind lives on regardless of what happens to your body mass.

ok, I understand.

By the way, in response to your signature:

"Can anyone enter the same river of time twice?"

I have a simple answer:

If you believe the number of time rivers is finite, then it is always probably and possible for anyone to enter the same river twice. If you believe the number of time rivers is infinite, then it is always improbable and impossible for anyone to enter the same river twice.

[AntonioLao]

you can also enter twice or as much as you want if the river does not flow but then it's not a river anymore, it turns into a stagnant lake. However the end point of any river is always a stagnant lake, in some cases it could be the entire ocean of the universe or Dirac's seas of negative energy.

[Guille]

you can also enter twice or as much as you want if the river does not flow but then it's not a river anymore, it turns into a stagnant lake. However the end point of any river is always a stagnant lake, in some cases it could be the entire ocean of the universe or Dirac's seas of negative energy.

Only if time si negative energy. Which in a basic general concept it cna be said to be.

Basically, for me:

Either if enegy, mass or speed (remember that speed is space/time)grows, the three will increase. This is because the force, which is the fundamental connection of these three, grows.

[AntonioLao]

I am stating a fundamental duality principle for the interconnectivity of spacetime points. This asserts that spacetime points can be connected by only 2 points at a time. If the connecting distance is to be minimized, there can only be one of this minimum distances within 8 spacetime points.

[Guille]

Three questions:

1. What determines that one space-time point can only be connected to 2 other space-time points?

2. What is a space-time point's size?

3. What does your principle explain about several paralel universes? Cana universe's space-time point be connected to another point of another paralel universe?

[AntonioLao]

1. What determines that one space-time point can only be connected to 2 other space-time points?

I meant one to one, not one to two. The logical reason is space quantization. Let's imagine that these quanta are arranged into a lattice structure where the distance between any two points is unity. Any distance less than 1 would be meaningless because fractional distances put us back to reasoning about continuum and continuity of spatial domain.

2. What is a space-time point's size?

It is difficult to talk about size of infinitesimal quantities. However, it is possible to normalize these quantities making them all equal to 1, which is the absolute minimum for each theoretical hypothesis.

3. What does your principle explain about several paralel universes? Cana universe's space-time point be connected to another point of another paralel universe?

Parallel universes can be viewed as concentric spheres. Larger radii imply higher dimensions.