[Guille]

I think this is a big thing to discuss for the TOE. It belongs not only to the theme of what dimensions are, but of the interaction of dimensions with other natural phenomena (matter, energy, force...etz).

What is your personal theory of space-time, space or time points?

The basic things I want to know of what you think about space-time, space or time points are:

Are the spacially or temporally expanded?
Do they interact with matter, forces, energy or others? If yes, How? If no, why?
Are they connected? What makes them be connected? What is the connection made of?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE What is your personal theory of space-time

I'm sending a pdf file via email that I stayed up all night till 5 a.m. writing the 1st draft of my personal version of space-time quantization. This paper also described the mass ratio between proton and electron.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao I'm sending a pdf file via email that I stayed up all night till 5 a.m. writing the 1st draft of my personal version of space-time quantization. This paper also described the mass ratio between proton and electron.

Thanks, I'll read it later, when I have more time.

[Guille]

Ok, I have read it and I think I quite understanding.


In the paper you had a part where it said that the only way that H+ and H- coul dbe distinguished is if the factors of the infinitesimal distances and the unbounded infinitesimally localized forces (the v's and o's) where identically zero.

This gave me a contradiction. If the H equaled the factors mentioned, and the factors mentioned are 0, then, should the H be also 0, and, so, there is no difference between H+ and H- because 0 is neither negative nor postivie. This means that there IS distingtion between H+ and H- if and only if H isn't identically 0. But you say exactly the opposite. How come?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE But you say exactly the opposite. How come?

That's the funny part about vectors multiplications. The scalar product of the same vectors is 1, while the cross product is zero.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao That's the funny part about vectors multiplications. The scalar product of the same vectors is 1, while the cross product is zero.

I think that having different kinds of operators of one unique type of operator is cmpletely un-logical, un-mathematical, and ridicolous......Never mind, it's probably one of my getting-pist-off-by-mathematics days...hahahaha...

Now really, can you explain me the diff between the types of multiplications? I know you ahve done so already, it just doesn't want to get into my head.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE can you explain me the diff between the types of multiplications

There are two: the dot product and the cross product. For two vectors A and B, their absolute value by dot product is cos(angle)|A||B|. The absolute value of their cross product is sin(angle)|A||B|. The vectors themselves dont have to be zero but the angular arguments can have values between [0,1] inclusively. For example, sin(90º)=1, cos(90º)=0, sin(0º)=0, and cos(0º)=1.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao There are two: the dot product and the cross product. For two vectors A and B, their absolute value by dot product is cos(angle)|A||B|. The absolute value of their cross product is sin(angle)|A||B|. The vectors themselves dont have to be zero but the angular arguments can have values between [0,1] inclusively. For example, sin(90º)=1, cos(90º)=0, sin(0º)=0, and cos(0º)=1.

humm, ok.

Doesn't the tangent have another kind of prudct? Why/why not?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE Doesn't the tangent have another kind of prudct?

The tangent function is just the ratio of sine over the cosine tanβ=sinβ÷cosβ.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao The tangent function is just the ratio of sine over the cosine tanβ=sinβ÷cosβ.

I hadn't actually thought that.

But if you realise, it's sort of un-solutional answer, because then I can say that cosine is the multiplication of sin and tan. And sin the multiplication of cos and tan. So, none can be proven fundamental by this. It's like the f=ma equation. What do cos and sin ahve that tan hasn't? Is it just a outcast-making process by mathematicians? lol...