spacetime substantiation without hole

[AntonioLao]

The following image shows spacetime substantiation without hole if the true vacuum is the synthesis of continuous space, matter, and energy into quantized spacetime.

[Guille]

The image is quite confusing.

Humm, I think I understand why the false vacuum and true vacuum are where they are. But I disagree with the principle.

Because even-even and odd-odd should make a vacuum (zero, nothingness) for the fact that they eliminate each other.

But where you write true vacuum is what actually should be even-odd. just as matter. Maybe it should be another thing, not matter. I just have come a long something: Force.

Anyway, I have two questions:

From where do you take the odds and even properties for each?

What could the "odd" part and the "even" part be physically?

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks for this thread Antonio,It has given me some Ideas.are the spheres
that you illustrated which are overlapping each other,sort of linking dimensions
that each seem to complment the other.and could then the absence of a hole
be maybe the discovery of the Whole!






kind regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

From where do you take the odds and even properties for each?

The oddness and evenness of Hadamard matrices. As I mentioned in several posts, each Hadamard matrix physically describes the square of energy.

[Guille]

The oddness and evenness of Hadamard matrices. As I mentioned in several posts, each Hadamard matrix physically describes the square of energy.

True. But what I meant in the second question was if the just "even" part or the "odd" part could be soemthing like, space, time, matter, energy, force.....? Could it be speed, acceleration? Could it be mass? What are they?

[mkirkpatrick]

Just a question Antonio,how can one square matter when the whole of its presentation in phenomenal space is totally unknown!Just has me puzzled.





kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Just a question Antonio,how can one square matter when the whole of its presentation in phenomenal space is totally unknown!Just has me puzzled.





kind regards michael.

Actually he sqaures energy, not matter. But true, how can E be sqaured if the total value of E isn't known? And if the universe is an open system, then E could be changing every planck's time.

[AntonioLao]

For Guille and Mike,

Please note that the total relativistic energy equation is the square of this energy as solutions to Dirac equation. This is well established in relativistic quantum mechanics. All you need to do is look it up in textbooks for quantum mechanics or see the following site
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation

[AntonioLao]

The following image is that of atomic absorption and emission spectra before a magnetic field is applied.


When a magnetic field is applied note the line splitting in the yellow regions.

[dleviwing]

Antonio;
I think I would question the source of your images. It appears you are presenting doctored images. The splitting lines in the yellow appear to have been added to the picture. I know of no such effect in spectrometry and I should know since designing radiometric instrumentation was my profession for 15 years.
1..Lines are too sharp
2..Lines do not span the height of the image.
3..Lines are not proper spectrum color.
4..Emition and absorption images are not even the same elements.

best regards;
Dave